<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog entries from admin</title>
		<description>A short description about your blog</description>
		<link>http://www.computerforensicsdigest.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:56:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>United States v. Hill, No. CR 10-00261 JSW (N.D. Calif. 1-10-2011)</title>
			<link>http://www.computerforensicsdigest.com/277-united-states-v-hill-no-cr-10-00261-jsw-nd-calif-1-10-2011.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Motion to Suppress Denied in Part and Granted in Part -- Defendant was charged with &quot;two counts of production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 2251(a), one count of receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 2252(a)(2), and one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 2252(a)(4)(B).&quot; The charges stemmed from an investigation into a report that a man driving a white SUV had exposed himself to a young girl near the DixiRead More...</description>
			<author>Administrator</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:23:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>warrantless search</category>
 <category>U.S. District Court (N.D. California)</category>
 <category>search warrants</category>
 <category>police procedure</category>
 <category>iPhone/iPad/iPod</category>
 <category>child pornography</category>
 <category>California</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>United States v. Harmer, No. 10-1624 (8th Cir. 1-7-2011) </title>
			<link>http://www.computerforensicsdigest.com/274-united-states-v-harmer-no-10-1624-8th-cir-1-7-2011.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Judgment Affirmed -- Defendant was prosecuted for possession of child pornography following a search of his home and personal computer revealed hundreds of child pornography files. The affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant stated that investigators had traced a shared file to defendant's computer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The shared file contain an offer to distribute hundreds of files, including sixteen contained in the known child pornography list of the Internet Crimes Against Children task Read More...</description>
			<author>Administrator</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:19:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>U.S. Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)</category>
 <category>search warrants</category>
 <category>peer-to-peer software</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>U.S. v. Oliver, No. 09-10133 (5th Cir. 1-6-2011)</title>
			<link>http://www.computerforensicsdigest.com/273-us-v-oliver-no-09-10133-5th-cir-1-6-2011.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Laptop Search Upheld -- Defendant was indicted with various co-conspirators for stealing personal identifying information of other individuals and using it to file fraudulent unemployment claims in Texas. During their investigation, law enforcement officers learned from a co-conspirator that the defendant had stashed a cardboard box box and laptop computer at his girlfriend's apartment, and they went there to retrieve them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prior to their arrival, defendant's girlfriend opened the boxRead More...</description>
			<author>Administrator</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 21:51:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)</category>
 <category>Texas</category>
 <category>search warrants</category>
 <category>laptop</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>United States v. Dobbs, No. 09-5025 (10th Cir. 1-5-2011)</title>
			<link>http://www.computerforensicsdigest.com/270-united-states-v-dobbs-no-09-5025-10th-cir-1-5-2011.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Conviction Reversed &amp;mdash; During a computer forensics examination for alleged fraud, multiple images of child pornography were discovered on defendant's computer. A second search warrant was obtained and a federal forensics examiner eventually uncovered over 150 images of child pornography. Defendant was ultimately charged with one count of &quot;knowingly received and attempted to receive one or more visual depictions [of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct],&quot; i.e., two Web site bannersRead More...</description>
			<author>Administrator</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:28:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>U.S. Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)</category>
 <category>criminal</category>
 <category>child pornography</category>
 <category>cache</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

